AutomatedGenealogy.com

Hi Mark - on the following page, line 50 should have been line 15. I think it should likely be corrected - hope it's an easy one for you and I will do the proofing later. Thank you.

http://automatedgenealogy.com/census11/ ... mode=proof

Hi Cheryl -

Fixed. I'm getting good at the steps to fix these and it is becoming easy.

I accepted the corrections on the page, expect for the first one because you (if it is indeed your correction) have an extra 'a' in the name. The correction for the rest of the family on the previous page is good and I've accepted that.

Thanks and I hope all is well with you. Mark

The error in the surname "Berclawitch" was my error - thanks for catching that. Such an interesting surname! I appreciate your being able to solve the problem of lines missed. I can understand the frustration of the transcriber! All the best Cheryl M.

Another person missed: http://automatedgenealogy.com/census11/ ... mode=proof

Line 26 should read "Coombs Henry" but he was missed in transcription and is on Line 50.
having trouble linking this sub-district in case you're wondering why fewer than usual are linked. Many of them must have missed the 1901 Census.
Thanks again! Cheryl