AutomatedGenealogy.com

AutomatedGenealogy Volunteer and User Forum
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 7:17 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 8:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 8:25 pm
Posts: 4
The oft repeated statement that people used to write double 'ss' as 'fs' is a fallacy which has led to many errors in census transcription and other all manner of other documents. The 'long s' used when 'ss' occured was written by making the upper loop counter clockwise and the lower loop clockwise. When 'f' was written whether single or double, both the upper and lower loops are made counterclockwise (the pen moves forward to the right to create both upper and lower loops. Unfortunately transcriptions are filled with errors due to not distinguishing the 'long s' from the 'f'. Thus we see frequently Ross transcribed as "Rofs" etc.

If you wish to see a clear example of 'long s' versus 'ff', compare
'Long s' Ross (transcribed as Rofs) - 1852 / Canada West / Huron (county) / 133 Hay township / p. 4d, 5a, (9)
Double ff - Moncrieff - Canada West / Huron (county) / 133 Hay township / p. 1d, 2a, (3)

Sheila


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 11:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 11:36 pm
Posts: 675
Location: Ottawa
heila,

All the "Rofs" in the 1852 census have been checked and corrected to "Ross"

Thanks,

_________________
Alain


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group