AutomatedGenealogy.com

Gilbert,

In the linked records there are two 1881 census entries for 7 yr old Theophile Dagenais, one with parents and one with aunt.

In 1891, the parents of 7 yr old Theophile Dagenais listed in 1881 are listed without him.
There are two Theophile Dagenais, one 13 yr old with parents but this is a different set of parents from the one in 1881; and one 14 yr old with aunt.

I checked BMS 2000 for marriage of Theophile Dagenais (father in 1881) whose spouse name is Caroline and obtain the following two results:
Men's name / Women's name / Date / Location
DAGENAIS Théophile / GRAVES Caroline / 1850 / Sorel, Richelieu, Q...
DAGENAIS Theophile / VERSAILLES Caroline / 1872 / Montréal, Ile-de-Mo...

But only Theophile Dagenais who married Caroline Versailles could be 31 yr old in 1881.

Also checked BMS 2000 for marriage of Dagenais (Men) whose spouse suname is Versailles and obtain the following result:
Men's name / Women's name / Date / Location
DAGENAIS Theophile / VERSAILLES Caroline / 1872 / Montréal, Ile-de-Mo...

As the 1881 Aunt's name is Emelie VERSAILLES, she is most likely the mother of Caroline Versailles above.

I also checked BMS 2000 for baptism of Theophile Dagenais between 1870 and 1880 wth only one result:
Name / Date / Location
DAGENAIS J. Théophile Augustin Bruno / 1877 / Montreal (Sault-au-Récollet), Ile-...

Therefore my conclusion is that the two Theophile Dagenais listed in 1881 that are linked together is the same individual; i.e.enumerated twice, once witn his parents then a second time with his aunt.

Cheers,

_________________
Alain

Gilbert,

In 1901, the occupation is charretier in one and Chartier (most likely charetier) in the other; which add more weight that they are the same individual.

As for 1911 the one married to Clementine Guernon (GUERNON Marie-Dalcé according to BMS 2000), whose occupation is peintre; and the other one, the lodger, whose occupation is debardeur de port are most likely not the same individual. As to if one was the same individual as the one in 1881/1901, I was not able to come to any conclusion.

My gut feeling is that Theopile the lodger is the brother of Amable listed on the line above, if that is the case he is not the same individual as the one in 1901/1881.

Cheers,

_________________
Alain